Combined oral contraceptive with estetrol plus drospirenone: from pharmacokinetics to clinical applications.

INTRODUCTION: Drospirenone/estetrol (DRSP/E4) is a combined oral contraceptive (COC) recently approved in several countries. It is composed of 15 mg of E4, a natural estrogen produced by human fetal liver throughout pregnancy, and 3 mg of DRSP, the first synthetic progestin used in oral contraception derived from 17-α-spirolactone. E4 and DRSP synergistically prevent pregnancy by inhibiting ovulation. E4 differs from 17-ß-estradiol or ethinylestradiol because it represents a native estrogen with selective action in tissues (NEST), therefore it displays both agonist and antagonist estrogenic effects in different tissues. AREAS COVERED: In this paper, we reviewed the scientific literature published in English prior to April 2023 and gathered information on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DRSP, E4 and their combination for contraception. We also proposed possible clinical applications based on the characteristics of the components of this COC. EXPERT OPINION: E4/DRSP-based COC has shown high tolerability, safety and satisfaction and may represent a viable choice in young girls in need of oral contraception and pill users who suffer from high cholesterol, breast tenderness or water retention. Moreover, this new COC shows higher scheduled bleeding rate compared to other pills containing natural estrogens. All the data are reassuring, permitting long-term use.

Drospirenone and estetrol: evaluation of a newly approved novel oral contraceptive.

INTRODUCTION: Estetrol (E4) is a native estrogen produced only by the fetal liver during pregnancy. E4 is the first new estrogen to be used in hormonal contraception since the introduction of oral contraceptives in 1960. Ethinyl estradiol, the most commonly used estrogen in oral contraceptives today, increases the risks of thromboembolism and has other significant hepatic impacts, which induce important drug-drug interactions. On the other hand, Phase 2 E4 characterization studies demonstrated that E4 has negligible impacts on liver, breast, and vascular endothelium due to its distinct tissue selectivity. Combined with drospirenone (DRSP), E4 offers an improved safety profile for oral contraception. AREAS COVERED: This paper briefly highlights the unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features of E4. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability results from the Phase 2 and 3 studies of the E4/DRSP pill are discussed to provide the reader with a thorough understanding of E4 and information to use when counseling potential users. EXPERT OPINION: The estetrol/drospirenone oral contraceptive is effective and well tolerated and provides good cycle control. In the future, estetrol may be the estrogen of choice if subsequent evidence verifies that it reduces the risks associated with current estrogens, such as venous thromboembolism and drug-drug interactions.

Comparison of Estetrol Exposure between Women and Mice to Model Preclinical Experiments and Anticipate Human Treatment.

Estetrol (E4) is a natural estrogen with promising therapeutic applications in humans. The European Medicines Agency and the Food and Drug Administration have approved the use of 15 mg E4/3 mg drospirenone for contraceptive indication. Phase III clinical trials with 15-20 mg E4 for the relief of climacteric complaints are currently running. Relevant data from preclinical animal models are needed to characterize the molecular mechanisms and the pharmacological effects of E4 and possibly to reveal new therapeutic applications and to anticipate potential adverse effects. Therefore, it is important to design experimental procedures in rodents that closely mimic or anticipate human E4 exposure. In this study, we compared the effects of E4 exposure after acute or chronic administration in women and mice. Women who received chronic E4 treatment per os at a dose of 15 mg once daily reached a steady state within 6 to 8 days, with a mean plasma concentration of 3.20 ng/mL. Importantly, with subcutaneous, intraperitoneal or oral administration of E4 in mice, a stable concentration over time that would mimic human pharmacokinetics could not be achieved. The use of osmotic minipumps continuously releasing E4 for several weeks provided an exposure profile mimicking chronic oral administration in women. Measurements of the circulating concentration of E4 in mice revealed that the mouse equivalent dose necessary to mimic human treatment does not fit with the allometric prediction. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of precise definition of the most appropriate dose and route of administration to utilize when developing predictive preclinical animal models to mimic or anticipate specific human treatment.

Estetrol: From Preclinical to Clinical Pharmacology and Advances in the Understanding of the Molecular Mechanism of Action.

Estetrol (E4) is the most recently described natural estrogen. It is produced by the human fetal liver during pregnancy and its physiological function remains unclear. E4 is the estrogenic component of a recently approved combined oral contraceptive. It is also in development for use as menopausal hormone therapy. In the context of these developments, the pharmacological activity of E4, alone or in combination with a progestin, has been extensively characterized in preclinical models as well as in clinical studies in women of reproductive age and postmenopausal women. Despite the clinical benefits, the use of oral estrogens for contraception or menopause is also associated with unwanted effects, such as an increased risk of breast cancer and thromboembolic events, due to their impact on non-target tissues. Preclinical and clinical data for E4 point to a tissue-specific activity and a more selective pharmacological profile compared with other estrogens, including a low impact on the liver and hemostasis balance. This review summarizes the characterization of the pharmacological properties of E4 as well as recent advances made in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of action driving its activity. How the unique mode of action and the different metabolism of E4 might support its favorable benefit-risk ratio is also discussed.

Tolerability and safety of the estetrol/drospirenone combined oral contraceptive: Pooled analysis of two multicenter, open-label phase 3 trials.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate tolerability and safety of estetrol (E4) 15 mg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg oral contraceptive using pooled data from two, multicenter, phase 3 trials. STUDY DESIGN: The two trials enrolled participants aged 16-50 years with a body mass index ≤35.0 kg/m2 to use E4/DRSP in a 24/4-day regimen for up to 13 cycles. We pooled data from participants who used at least one E4/DRSP dose and had a follow-up assessment to analyze adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and laboratory parameters, including serum lipids, glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and potassium. We consolidated similar Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms into groupings. RESULTS: Of 3725 participants enrolled, we included 3417 in the analyses of whom 1786 (52.3%) reported ≥1 AE. Most participants with reported AEs had AEs that investigators rated as mild or moderate (n = 1665, 93.2%); of participants reporting AEs, 1105 (61.9%) did so during cycles 1 to 3. In total, 981 (28.7%) participants experienced ≥1 treatment-related AE, most frequently related to bleeding complaints (n = 323, 9.5%), breast pain or tenderness (n = 136, 4.0%), acne (n = 113, 3.3%), and mood disturbance (n = 111, 3.2%). Discontinuation due to treatment-related AEs occurred in 272 participants (8.0%), with only bleeding complaints (n = 97, 2.8%) and mood disturbance (n = 38, 1.1%) at rates exceeding 1%. Three participants experienced serious AEs, which the site investigators considered treatment-related: one venous thromboembolism, one worsening of depression, and one ectopic pregnancy. We found no clinically relevant changes in weight, blood pressure, heart rate, or laboratory parameters during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: E4/DRSP is associated with a favorable tolerability and safety profile. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Pooling data allowed for a robust assessment of tolerability and safety, including relatively infrequent events. Other than bleeding complaints and mood disturbance, no adverse event resulted in E4/DRSP discontinuation at rates >1%. Post-marketing surveillance studies are needed to evaluate long-term safety of the E4/DRSP COC and population-based venous thromboembolism risks.

Low Thrombin Generation in Users of a Contraceptive Containing Estetrol and Drospirenone.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact on thrombin generation of the new combined oral contraceptive containing 15 mg estetrol and 3 mg drospirenone with ethinylestradiol (30 or 20 mcg) associated either with 150 mcg levonorgestrel or with 3 mg drospirenone. METHODS: Data were collected from the "E4/DRSP Endocrine Function, Metabolic Control and Hemostasis Study" (NCT02957630). Overall, the per-protocol set population included 24 subjects in the ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel arm, 28 subjects in the ethinylestradiol/drospirenone arm, and 34 subjects in the estetrol/drospirenone arm. Thrombograms and thrombin generation parameters (lag time, peak, time to peak, endogenous thrombin potential, and mean velocity rate index) were extracted for each subject at baseline and after 6 cycles of treatment. RESULTS: After 6 cycles of treatment, ethinylestradiol-containing products arms show a mean thrombogram outside the upper limit of the reference range, that is the 97.5th percentile of all baseline thrombograms. On the other hand, the mean thrombogram of estetrol/drospirenone is within this reference interval. After 6 cycles of treatment, all thrombin generation parameters are statistically less affected by estetrol/drospirenone than ethinylestradiol-containing products. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, an association of 15 mg estetrol with 3 mg drospirenone does not have an impact on thrombin generation compared with ethinylestradiol-containing products that, either associated with levonorgestrel or drospirenone, are able to increase the production of procoagulant factors and decrease the production of anticoagulant ones, shifting the patient to a prothrombotic state. Ethinylestradiol-containing products thus generate prothrombotic environments contrary to estetrol which demonstrates a neutral profile on hemostasis.

Pooled efficacy results of estetrol/drospirenone combined oral contraception phase 3 trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate overall and subgroup efficacy of an estetrol (E4) 15 mg drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg oral contraceptive in a 24/4-day regimen. STUDY DESIGN: We pooled efficacy outcomes from 2 pivotal phase 3 contraceptive trials with E4/DRSP conducted in the United States/Canada and Europe/Russia. We assessed Pearl Index (PI; pregnancies per 100 participant-years) and 13-cycle life-table pregnancy rates in at-risk cycles (confirmed intercourse and no other contraceptive use) among participants 16 to 35 years. We calculated PI by age and further subcategorization (contraceptive history and body mass index [BMI]). We performed multivariable analysis using Cox regression to assess impact of potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Analyses included 3027 participants, of whom 451 (14.9%) had a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. The pooled PI was 1.52 (95% confidence interval 1.04-2.16) and the 13-cycle life-table pregnancy rate was 1.28% (0.83%-1.73%). We calculated unadjusted pooled PI in participants 16 to 25 years and 26 to 35 years of 1.61 (0.94-2.57) and 1.43 (0.78-2.40), respectively; in new starters and switchers of 1.88 (1.09-3.00) and 1.24 (0.68-2.08), respectively; and by BMI <25 kg/m2, 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, and ≥30 kg/m2 of 1.14 (0.64-1.88), 2.19 (1.05-4.03), and 2.27 (0.83-4.94), respectively. In multivariable analysis, we found associations of prior pregnancy (hazard ratio [HR] 3.61[1.56-8.38]), Black race (HR 4.61[1.97-10.80]), age 16 to 25 years (HR 2.37[1.09-5.15]) and compliance <99% of expected pills (HR 4.21[2.04-8.66]) with conception. CONCLUSION: E4/DRSP is an effective oral contraceptive overall and across subgroups stratified by age, contraceptive history, and BMI. Other than compliance, predictors of contraceptive failure are nonmodifiable. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Pooled results from two phase 3 trials demonstrate high contraceptive efficacy of the novel estetrol-drospirenone oral contraceptive. Several non-modifiable risk factors, including prior pregnancy, race, and age, are associated with higher pregnancy risk. Additional research is needed to better understand predictors of combined oral contraceptive failure.

A novel estetrol-containing combined oral contraceptive: European expert panel review.

PURPOSE: Despite considerable advances in recently developed combined oral contraceptives (COCs), resulting in lower rates of adverse events while maintaining contraceptive efficacy, there is interest in further innovation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Estetrol (E4), a native oestrogen, and progestin drospirenone (DRSP) were combined in a new COC. A European expert panel reviewed the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety and tolerability of this combination. Their findings are presented as a narrative review. RESULTS: E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg in a 24/4 regimen provided effective contraception with good cycle control, characterised by a predictable regular bleeding pattern and minimal unscheduled bleeding, together with a good safety profile. The combination was associated with high user satisfaction, well-being, and minimal changes in body weight. The effects on endocrine and metabolic parameters were limited, and the combination was found to have a limited impact on liver function and lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Moreover, its effect on several haemostatic parameters was lower than that of comparators containing ethinyl oestradiol (EE) 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg and EE 30 µg/levonorgestrel 150 µg. CONCLUSION: E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg provides safe and effective contraception, with high user satisfaction and predictable bleeding. Further research will evaluate the long-term safety of the COC.

Estetrol/Drospirenone: A Review in Oral Contraception.

Estetrol/drospirenone is a combined oral contraceptive (COC) with a plant-synthesised foetal oestrogen (estetrol) and a well-established progestin (drospirenone). In preclinical models, estetrol has lower binding affinity for the oestrogen receptor-α (ER-α) in contrast to estradiol and has antagonistic properties against membrane ER-α in several tissues, including the breast, while retaining agonistic activity on receptors located in the nucleus. The low oestrogenicity of estetrol may potentially contribute to reduced thrombotic risk. Estetrol/drospirenone was an effective contraceptive in phase II and III clinical trials, with regular and predictable bleeding cycles maintained in the majority of women. Estetrol/drospirenone was generally well-tolerated with metrorrhagia reported as the most common treatment-related adverse event, which is consistent with other COCs. Cases of migraines with aura (or severe migraines), deep vein thrombosis, hyperkalaemia and depression were rarely reported during the phase III trials. Overall, estetrol/drospirenone is an effective and generally well-tolerated COC, with a potentially reduced risk of thrombosis.

In 2019, an estimated 44% of women aged 15­49 years worldwide used modern contraception methods, and in these women using modern methods, 18% used an oral contraceptive. Estetrol/drospirenone is a combined oral contraceptive (COC) which uses estetrol, a plant-synthesised oestrogen naturally produced by the human foetal liver during pregnancy, in combination with drospirenone, a well-known progestin. Combined, these hormones suppress ovulation, which constitutes their primary mode of action in preventing pregnancy. As estetrol has weaker oestrogen-related effects, it may potentially reduce the risk for blood clots. Estetrol/drospirenone was an effective contraceptive in clinical trials, and most women had regular and predictable bleeding cycles. Metrorrhagia (i.e. abnormal bleeding) was the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse effect; however, this is a common issue with hormonal contraceptives. Cases of severe migraine headaches, deep vein thrombosis, high potassium levels or depression were rarely reported during clinical trials. Estetrol/drospirenone is an effective oral contraceptive, which may offer a contraceptive option with a lower risk for blood clots. However, further research is required to confirm the reduced risk of clotting.

Profile of estetrol, a promising native estrogen for oral contraception and the relief of climacteric symptoms of menopause.

INTRODUCTION: Estrogens used in women's healthcare have been associated with increased risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and breast cancer. Estetrol (E4), an estrogen produced by the human fetal liver, has recently been approved for the first time as a new estrogenic component of a novel combined oral contraceptive (E4/drospirenone [DRSP]) for over a decade. In phase 3 studies, E4/DRSP showed good contraceptive efficacy, a predictable bleeding pattern, and a favorable safety and tolerability profile. AREAS COVERED: This narrative review discusses E4's pharmacological characteristics, mode of action, and the results of preclinical and clinical studies for contraception, as well as for menopause and oncology. EXPERT OPINION: Extensive studies have elucidated the properties of E4 that underlie its favorable safety profile. While classical estrogens (such as estradiol) exert their actions via both activation of nuclear and membrane estrogen receptor α (ERα), E4 presents a specific profile of ERα activation: E4 binds and activates nuclear ERα but does not induce the activation of membrane ERα signaling pathways in specific tissues. E4 has a small effect on normal breast tissue proliferation and minimally affects hepatic parameters. This distinct profile of ERα activation, uncoupling nuclear and membrane activation, is unique.

Estetrol and drospirenone: a novel oral contraceptive.

Estetrol (E4) is a natural human estrogen produced during human pregnancy in the fetal liver with a unique mechanism of action that displays tissue-selective activity, and behaves as a natural selective estrogen receptor modulator. E4 acts as an estrogen agonist on the vagina, the uterus and the endometrium, and also shows bone-sparing activity. Its mechanism of action results in neutral impact on endocrine, metabolic and hemostatic parameters, compared with other oral contraceptives. In 2021, Health Canada approved the combination 15 mg E4/3 mg drospirenone (DRSP), the first and only combined oral contraceptive based on the native estrogen E4, which has been synthesized from plant-based sources. Shortly afterwards, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also approved the combination 14.2 mg E4/3 mg DRSP as a female contraceptive.

Estetrol-Drospirenone combination oral contraceptive: a clinical study of contraceptive efficacy, bleeding pattern and safety in Europe and Russia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the contraceptive efficacy, bleeding pattern and safety of a combined oral contraceptive containing estetrol (E4) 15 mg and drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg. DESIGN: Multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial. SETTING: Sixty-nine sites in Europe and Russia. POPULATION: Sexually active women aged 18-50 years with regular menstrual cycles and body mass index ≤35 kg/m2 . METHODS: E4/DRSP was administered in a 24 active/4 placebo regimen for up to 13 cycles. Visits were scheduled during Cycles 2, 4, 7 and 10 and after completing treatment during which adverse events (AEs) were collected. Participants recorded medication intake, vaginal bleeding/spotting, use of other contraceptive methods and sexual intercourse on a daily diary. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pearl Index (PI) for women 18-35 years (overall and method-failure), bleeding pattern and AEs. RESULTS: A total of 1553 women aged 18-50 years, including 1353 from 18 to 35 years old, received the study medication. PI was 0.47 pregnancies/100 woman-years (95% CI 0.15-1.11); method failure PI was 0.29 pregnancies/100 woman-years (95% CI 0.06-0.83). Scheduled bleeding/spotting occurred in 91.9-94.4% of women over Cycles 1 to 12 and lasted a median of 4-5 days per cycle. The percentage of women with unscheduled bleeding/spotting episodes decreased from 23.5% in Cycle 1 to <16% from Cycle 6 onwards. The most common AEs were headache (7.7%), metrorrhagia (5.5%), vaginal haemorrhage (4.8%) and acne (4.2%). One treatment-related serious AE was reported, a lower extremity venous thromboembolism. One-hundred and forty-one (9.1%) women discontinued study participation because of treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: E4/DRSP provides effective contraception, a predictable bleeding pattern and a favourable safety profile. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: A phase 3 trial with E4/DRSP shows high contraceptive efficacy, a predictable bleeding pattern and favourable safety profile.

Estetrol and Mammary Gland: Friends or Foes?

Estrogens have pleiotropic effects on many reproductive and non-reproductive tissues and organs including the mammary gland, uterus, ovaries, vagina, and endothelium. Estrogen receptor α functions as the principal mediator of estrogenic action in most of these tissues. Estetrol (E4) is a native fetal estrogen with selective tissue actions that is currently approved for use as the estrogen component in a combined oral contraceptive and is being developed as a menopause hormone therapy (MHT, also known as hormone replacement therapy). However, exogenous hormonal treatments, in particular MHTs, have been shown to promote the growth of preexisting breast cancers and are associated with a variable risk of breast cancer depending on the treatment modality. Therefore, evaluating the safety of E4-based formulations on the breast forms a crucial part of the clinical development process. This review highlights preclinical and clinical studies that have assessed the effects of E4 and E4-progestogen combinations on the mammary gland and breast cancer, focusing in particular on the estrogenic and anti-estrogenic properties of E4. We discuss the potential advantages of E4 over current available estrogen-formulations as a contraceptive and for the treatment of symptoms due to menopause. We also consider the potential of E4 for the treatment of endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

Tumor suppression, dose-limiting toxicity and wellbeing with the fetal estrogen estetrol in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study (the ABCE4 study) was to assess dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of high doses of the fetal estrogen estetrol (E4) in postmenopausal patients with heavily pretreated, locally advanced and/or metastatic ER+/HER2-breast cancer, resistant to anti-estrogens. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, phase IB/IIA, dose-escalation study with a 3 + 3 cohort design, whereby successive cohorts of three patients received 20 mg, 40 mg or 60 mg E4 per day for 12 weeks by oral administration. DLTs, safety and wellbeing were evaluated after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment. Anti-tumor effects were investigated by computer tomography scanning and evaluated according to RECIST criteria before and after 12 weeks of treatment. Wellbeing was judged weekly by the investigator and by quality-of-life questionnaires by the patients. In view of the small number of patients, no statistical testing was performed. RESULTS: All 12 patients enrolled had progressive, heavily pre-treated advanced breast cancer. No treatment-related serious adverse events or DLTs occurred during the first 4 weeks of E4 treatment allowing the investigation of all three doses. Five of nine patients completing 12 weeks of E4 treatment showed objective anti-tumor effects and six of nine patients reported improved wellbeing. CONCLUSION: High doses of estetrol seem to be safe and are well tolerated during 12 weeks of treatment without dose-limiting toxicity and with anti-tumor effects in five of nine heavily treated patients with progressive, anti-estrogen resistant, advanced breast cancer.

Evaluation of the effect of a new oral contraceptive containing estetrol and drospirenone on hemostasis parameters.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect on hemostasis parameters of a new combined oral contraceptive (COC). STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized, single centre, open-label, exploratory study, healthy women received either 15 mg estetrol/3 mg drospirenone (E4/DRSP) (n = 39), 30 mcg ethinylestradiol/150 mcg levonorgestrel (EE/LNG) (n = 30), or 20 mcg ethinylestradiol/3 mg drospirenone (EE/DRSP) (n = 32) for six 28-day cycles. Blood was collected at baseline, cycle 3, and cycle 6. Median change from baseline was evaluated for procoagulant, anticoagulant, and fibrinolytic parameters, and for sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). RESULTS: Median change of endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) based activated protein C sensitivity resistance (APCr) at cycle 6 was +30% for E4/DRSP, +165% for EE/LNG (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP), and +219% for EE/DRSP (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP). Changes to prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 and SHBG for E4/DRSP, EE/LNG, and EE/DRSP were +23%, +71%, and +64% (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP); and +55%, +74% and +251% (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP), respectively. At cycle 6, changes to other hemostasis parameters for E4/DRSP were similar or smaller than for EE/LNG or EE/DRSP. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, changes in hemostasis parameters after treatment with 6 cycles of E4/DRSP were smaller or similar to those observed for EE/LNG. Similar, but more pronounced changes were also observed versus EE/DRSP, which supports the hypothesis that the effect of COCs on hemostasis parameters is mainly mediated by the estrogenic component. Further studies are needed to provide more insight into the venous thromboembolic risk of E4/DRSP. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: This study reports that the effects on hemostasis parameters of a COC containing 15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP are less or similar to those for EE/LNG or EE/DRSP. It also demonstrates that the choice of estrogen modulates the effects of COCs on hemostasis parameters.

A Dose-Escalating Study With the Fetal Estrogen Estetrol in Healthy Men.

Context: Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists have replaced estrogens for endocrine treatment of advanced prostate cancer (PC) because of cardiovascular side effects. The fetal estrogen estetrol (E4) may be safer for PC treatment and is expected to decrease testosterone (T) and prevent estrogen deficiency. Objective: To investigate the safety and T-suppressive effect of E4 in healthy men. Design: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating study. Setting: The study was conducted at a phase I clinical unit (QPS, Netherlands). Participants: Healthy male volunteers aged 40 to 70 years. Intervention(s): Three treatment cohorts of 15 volunteers with placebo (n = 5) and E4 (n = 10). Estetrol doses tested were 20, 40, and 60 mg/d. Subjects were treated for 4 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: Subjective side effects, pharmacodynamic effects on hemostatic variables, lipids, glucose, bone parameters, and endocrine parameters related to T metabolism. Results: Total and free T decreased dose-dependently and significantly. Nipple tenderness occurred in 40% and decrease of libido occurred in 30% of E4-treated men. The unwanted estrogenic effects on hemostasis were small, dose dependent, and in some cases significant. Lipid and bone parameters showed a favorable trend. Conclusion: The effect of E4 on testosterone levels is insufficient for standalone PC treatment. Taking all clinical and pharmacodynamic variables into consideration, a daily dose of 40 mg E4 seems safe for further evaluation of endocrine PC treatment in combination with LHRH analogs.

Clinical effects of the fetal estrogen estetrol in a multiple-rising-dose study in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: Estetrol (E4) is a natural fetal estrogen. The safety of increasing doses of E4 and its preliminary effects on the vagina, endometrium and menopausal vasomotor symptoms were investigated. STUDY DESIGN: This was a partly randomized, open-label, multiple-rising-dose study in 49 postmenopausal women. Subjects with an intact uterus were randomized to receive either 2mg E4 or 2mg estradiol-valerate (E2V) for 28days. Subsequent dose-escalation groups (non-randomized) were: 10mg E4 (intact uterus and ≥35 hot flushes/week); and 20mg and 40mg E4 (hysterectomized subjects). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adverse events (AEs) and vaginal cytology were evaluated in all treatment groups; hot flushes/sweating and endometrial proliferation were analyzed with 2 and 10mg E4 and 2mg E2V. RESULTS: Estetrol appeared to be safe, without serious drug-related AEs. In all the groups there was a clear shift from parabasal to superficial vaginal cells, indicating an estrogenic effect and a potential for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy. The endometrial thickness remained stable in the 2mg E4 group and increased with E2V and 10mg E4. A decrease in the mean number of hot flushes and sweating was seen with 2 and 10mg E4 and 2mg E2V. CONCLUSIONS: Estetrol in a dose range of 2-40mg per day improved vaginal cytology and vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women. Endometrial proliferation occurred with the 10mg dose. Estetrol seems a safe and suitable candidate to develop further for hormone therapy.

Bleeding pattern and cycle control with estetrol-containing combined oral contraceptives: results from a phase II, randomised, dose-finding study (FIESTA).

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess vaginal bleeding patterns and cycle control of oral contraceptives containing estetrol (E4) combined with either drospirenone (DRSP) or levonorgestrel (LNG). STUDY DESIGN: An open-label, multicentre, randomised, dose-finding study lasting six cycles in healthy women aged 18-35 years was used. Four treatments (15 mg or 20 mg E4, combined with either 3 mg DRSP or 150 mcg LNG) were administered in a 24/4-day regimen. A marketed dosing regimen of estradiol valerate with dienogest (E2V/DNG) served as reference since it contains (like E4) a natural oestrogen. RESULTS: A total of 396 women were randomised, of whom 389 received study medication, and 316 completed the study. By cycle 6, the frequencies of unscheduled bleeding and/or spotting and absence of withdrawal bleeding were the lowest in the 15 mg E4/DRSP group (33.8% and 3.5%, respectively). In the E2V/DNG reference group, these frequencies were 47.8% and 27.1%, respectively. By cycle 6, the frequency of women with absence of withdrawal bleeding was <20% for all E4 treatment groups: 3.5-3.8% combined with DRSP and 14.0-18.5% combined with LNG. By cycle 6, unscheduled intracyclic bleeding was reported by <20% of women in the 20 mg E4/LNG group (18.9%) and in the 15 mg E4/DRSP group (16.9%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that, of the four treatment modalities investigated, the 15 mg E4/DRSP combination has the most favourable bleeding pattern and cycle control. IMPLICATIONS: Due to its favourable bleeding pattern and cycle control, the 15 mg E4/DRSP combination is the preferred combination for further phase III clinical development.